Reporter pleads guilty in sheep abduction case

© AgMedia Inc.

Comments

Is this the same Tom Black who is or was publisher of the Landowners magazine? Nothing wrong with that but it just adds yet another media type to a story that's already overrun with them.

I checked the website for the sheeps owner and she says she's a reporter for magazines and newspapers.

You are not factually correct..it doesn't say that anywhere. It says she had stories appear in different publications...says nothing about being a reporter.

Antiestablishmentarianism,it was a course offered at Conestoga college many years ago.
Would not surprise me if most of the people involved in this case not only took the course but graduated with honours.

I can understand why people think that the CFIA overreacts to a scrapie positive diagnosis. I don't disagree that it may be a naturally-occurring disease that probably does not pose a threat to human health. But it does spread from one animal to another if the conditions are right, and every animal with classic scrapie (as opposed to atypical scrapie) can potentially spread it to other young animals. If you are selling sheep to other producers, it does pose a threat to those producers' flocks. If I get scrapie in my flock, at the very least I would like to know where it came from. I would like to provide the courtesy to other producers, to whom I may have sold sheep, that they may be able to at least genotype and find out if their flock is at risk. The CFIA acts based on the protocol of the law at that time. That is what they do. Put yourself in their shoes for a moment. You follow these sheep around all over the place, like Keystone Kops or something, and in the course of your investigation, you find dead sheep. I believe that at every stop you would be more and more convinced that you are doing the right thing. But regardless of that, what everyone has to keep in mind is that when scrapie is found in a flock of sheep, there are options. There is live testing and genotyping. Only the most susceptible animals need be destroyed. If the situation warrants it, for instance in a case with rare breeds, the CFIA will allow the producer to keep the susceptible (QQ) ewes and breed them to a resistant (RR) ram, and keep the resulting QR offspring. If a producer refuses to do that, that is their business. But the program is in place. A long time ago, certain producers worked with the CFIA to initiate the genotyping program. After this particular case, the producer who bought the ewe that started this whole fiasco worked with the CFIA to set up the project to preserve genetics. People who flout the rules and behave as if the law does not apply to them make it look as if perhaps all that work was for nothing. Another question for you- if they found 26 sheep and only 11 could be identified, that means 15 sheep could not have been identified.

I want people to think critically about these things, please don't just take everything at face value. There has been a tendency in this entire case for only part of the story to get out into the public domain. It has been a real eye-opener to see how easy it is to manipulate a story, just by leaving out the parts that don't suit.

Editor: Comment modified for legal reasons.

As per: www.scrapiecanada.ca/government.html
Compensation IS paid by CFIA up to a maximum of $825 for unregistered sheep and $1200 for registered sheep.

Read it through..it is carefully worded. "May" is not "will".

No, it is not "will". What happens if the person in this case did not comply with the quarantine? Why would she qualify for compensation?

Comment modified for legal reasons

This article is incredibly biased and not at all informative about the facts regarding what the CFIA does or doesn't do when scrapie is reported. Scrapie is a serious problem that many in the sheep industry have been working hard, together with the government, to eradicate. It's one of the major reasons that we cannot easily import or export sheep to or from other countries, limiting our gene pools tremendously. We have laws in place regarding livestock health for a very important reason, that is to protect both the producers (along with their animals) and the consumers from harm. Producers who refuse to comply with the decisions made by the CFIA, who refuse to even dialogue with them in order to push their own agendas and to gain notoriety, ill gotten monies and some kind of martyr status have NO place in farming, in my opinion. They should be punished to the fullest extent of the law, not given a platform in the media to continue to hurt the rest of the industry.

Editor: Comment edited for legal reasons.

December 16, 2014

Evidence for zoonotic potential of ovine scrapie prions

scrapie-usa.blogspot.com/

transmissiblespongiformencephalopathy.blogspot.com/

I THINK THAT THE PUNISHMENT DOES NOT FIT THE CRIME ,THESE PEOPLE SHOULD BE THANKED FOR TRYING TO SAVE SOME SHEEP AND A LADY WHO NEEDS THERE HELP ! BUT INSTEAD THE LAW COMES DOWN ON THEN ,CUTS A DEAL ,THEY HANG THE LADY AND HER OTHER HELPERS !! WERE IS THE JUSTICE IN ALL THIS !! I HAVE BEEN THERE BEFORE ,THE ONLY WAY YOU WIN ,IS ALL STICK TOGETHER AND FIGHT TOGETHER ,WHAT YOU PEOPLE TRIED TO DO IS SAVE SOME RARE SHEEP AND HELP A LADY WHO WAS OR IS GOING BROKE !! THIS COUNTRY HAS TURNED INTO THE MOST POLICED STATE IN NOTH AMERICA ,WE HAVE NO RIGHTS ANYMORE !! GOVERNMENTS HAVE TAKEN THEM ALL BACK AND MORE ,MEAN WHILE THEY BREAK EVERY LAW THAT IS WRITTEN ALL IN THE NAME OF POWER OVER THE PEOPLE !! BILL DENBY / IMPORTER / EXPORTER

The CFIA has to many departments to keep occupied. A lot of the testing and inspections they do are to create paperwork to justify their positions and their vehicle expenses. The problem is that they are not farmers, they are agents of a government creation that supplies reports to another government creation which causes more inspections and testing which must be right because a government agency says so. I know which came first, the chicken or the egg, they don't!
Stan

Post new comment

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Image CAPTCHA
We welcome thoughtful comments and ideas. Comments must be on topic. Cheap shots, unsubstantiated allegations, anonymous attacks or negativity directed against people and organizations will not be published. Comments are modified or deleted at the discretion of the editors. If you wish to be identified by name, which will give your opinion far more weight and provide a far greater chance of being published, leave a telephone number so that identity can be confirmed. The number will not be published.