Ontario Pork gets marketing powers back

© AgMedia Inc.

February 16, 2010

Farm Products Marketing Commission slapped for ‘failing to respect the legislative principles’ of the Farm Products Marketing Act; plebiscite ordered

by BETTER FARMING STAFF

In October, 2008, the Ontario Farm Products Marketing Commission took away the powers of Ontario Pork. Yesterday the Ontario Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal gave them back.

The Tribunal’s 29-page ruling, released late yesterday, re-instates Regulation 419, which required producers to sell hogs through the marketing board and for the board to review all buy and sell contracts between producers and processors. The Commission revoked this regulation in 2008.

“In our view the Commission decision does not respect the legislative principles of the FPMA (Farm Products Marketing Act); it effectively negates the legislation by placing the control of marketing outside of the local board, without establishing an alternative plan or having any entity responsible for the control and regulation of hog marketing,” the Tribunal ruling says.

The Tribunal ordered Ontario Pork to continue with its strategic planning process from June 2008 and set a deadline in 18 months for the marketing board to submit recommendations for new regulations to the Farm Products Marketing Commission.  The Tribunal also ordered that changes to marketing be put to producers in a plebiscite before implementation.

This story will be updated throughout the day. BF

 

Description (Tag): 
Ontario Pork
Ontario Farm Products Marketing Commission
Ontario Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal
hog industry appeal

Comments

an online visitor replied on

The decision also allows an 18 month "trial" exemption to any producer not using OP marketing. I believe thats most of the hogs (80%to90%) in Ontario. It appears the tribunal is stradling the fence for the next 18 months, and that may be a good thing. It also gives OP the next 18 months to formulate a "stategic plan" for the entire industry (incuding packers). This of course assumes there is some wonderful elusive plan out there that is going to suit everybody. I wish OP well in their search for this plan.

an online visitor replied on

how surprised am I to see common sense prevail in a bureaucratic entity, this is the right ruling for all the right reasons. lets have pork producers decide how to market their pigs rather than buereaucrats, and the handful of winers and car/feed salesmen and plumbers who submitted the original petition to farm products. Now to really get get justice we just need farm products to cover th hundreds of thousands of dollars and wasted time their thoghtless ruling has cost the board and producers. and while we are at it lets can everyone on the commision and start fresh.

Add new comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
We welcome thoughtful comments and ideas. Comments must be on topic. Cheap shots, unsubstantiated allegations, anonymous attacks or negativity directed against people and organizations will not be published. Comments are modified or deleted at the discretion of the editors. If you wish to be identified by name, which will give your opinion far more weight and provide a far greater chance of being published, leave a telephone number so that identity can be confirmed. The number will not be published.

© AgMedia Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.