Agriculture one of Canada’s top five industries: FCC

© AgMedia Inc.

Nearly eight per cent of the country’s farms are run by farmers under 40 the federal crown corporation’s CEO notes during its annual meeting

Comments

they say eight percent are under 40 like it is a positive thing. if only eight percent are under 40 that means 92% are over 40. In most occupations this would mean that 98% of farmers are less than 15 - 20 years from retirement (most look to retire at about 55-60years old). so either the farmers over 40 are going to have to work to the grave or our leaders are going to have to start developing policy to get the younger generations involved. we can start by making it more difficult for non resident foreign ownership of farmland, these investors are driving up land prices way past what any younger farmer could ever hope to pay. That leaves them sitting on the sidelines and I know a few who have simply sold out because they see no possible way to compete for agricultures most valuble resource: LAND!. Not to mention when land prices skyrocket, it raises everyones cost of production the next time they have a tax assesment done on their farms. Maybe one of the farm leaders or politions will clue in before it is too late, but i wont hold my breath.

Firstly, I agree with the previous poster - it should be 28%, or even 38%, instead of 8%. FCC is trying to turn a rout into a victory, and is failing miserably.

Secondly, my experience tells me that a good portion of even that 8% are the sons and daughers of supply managed farmers who have inherited, or are about to inherit, the "gravy train"

My experience, as well as my younger non-supply managed farmers, both tell me that if we got rid of supply management,the 8% number would double overnight because the supply management-driven land price bubble would burst, thereby allowing more young farmers to get started.

The biggest loser would be FCC becuase they'd end up administering a lot more small loans to beginning farmers, rather than fewer, and huge, interest-only, loans to fat-cat supply managed farmers.

I think it's a loss agriculture can well-afford, and is quite-ready to pay.

Stephen Thompson, Clinton ON

Post new comment

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Image CAPTCHA
We welcome thoughtful comments and ideas. Comments must be on topic. Cheap shots, unsubstantiated allegations, anonymous attacks or negativity directed against people and organizations will not be published. Comments are modified or deleted at the discretion of the editors. If you wish to be identified by name, which will give your opinion far more weight and provide a far greater chance of being published, leave a telephone number so that identity can be confirmed. The number will not be published.