U.S. nixes October joint hog report

© AgMedia Inc.

Statistics Canada cuts blamed

Description (Tag): 

Comments

In Colombia we have also had many problems with pigs. After a heavy advertising schedule has improved the situation and publish pages http://www.agronet.gov.co the positive aspect of working with pigs. Hopefully not from escalating.

I was not able to find the reference to the recent news item that said to expect to pay more, much more for pork in the first quarter of 2013. Reduced feed stock due to drought has caused high sow sell off in many areas.

Cutting statistical information should mean a lessor work load and cuts in wages for the likes of Bill Parsons, of Statistics Canada commodity section chief should follow.

Maybe if this cost saving strategy works well we could cut weather reports to twice annually since they are seldom right, and we can just stick our heads out the door to see what it is doing anyway.

With the screwy way the markets react to every new survey that changes production even a bit, we might be better off with no reports. If the packers need pigs make them pay to get them, except with all the contracting going on they are the only ones that actually know how many pigs there actually are so they still win.

We haven't had a level playing field for Canadian farmers for years. Foreign governments subsidize their farmers but our government cuts support programs, research and now market information. Shameful!

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
We welcome thoughtful comments and ideas. Comments must be on topic. Cheap shots, unsubstantiated allegations, anonymous attacks or negativity directed against people and organizations will not be published. Comments are modified or deleted at the discretion of the editors. If you wish to be identified by name, which will give your opinion far more weight and provide a far greater chance of being published, leave a telephone number so that identity can be confirmed. The number will not be published.

© AgMedia Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.