Pork eaters are aging, Ontario Pork chairman warns Wednesday, April 1, 2009 by BETTER FARMING STAFFOther issues may have a greater impact on the provincial pork industry’s health than the current dispute over marketing and they need attention, warns Ontario Pork’s outgoing chairman.Curtiss Littlejohn warns pork’s primary consumer, the 55-year-old male, is aging and those between the ages of 25-35 “rarely, if ever,” consume the meat.“We need a long term plan of where to target our industry based on a minimum of 90,000 hogs per week,” says a copy of a speech he delivered at the board’s annual meeting in London on Tuesday.Littlejohn recommends the industry:• produce high value pork products for Canada and other countries and reduce dependence on live exports;• harness a $50 million federal slaughterhouse expansion fund to streamline processing and perhaps invest in a green energy plant; and• pursue marketing opportunities with China.He notes the provincial marketing board is participating in a national print and television pork advertising campaign that targets mature consumers “more inclined to care about where their meat comes from.”Littlejohn opened and ended his speech by describing the effects of the marketing board’s restructuring efforts and the Ontario Farm Products Marketing Commission order last October that eliminates Ontario Pork’s single desk marketing powers. Producers and regional producer organizations have appealed the order to the Ontario Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal.The Tribunal, in turn, has imposed a stay until the yet-to-be scheduled hearing on the order, which would have otherwise come into effect today. A pre-hearing conference April 17 will address the stay’s terms. Ontario Pork holds party status in the hearing.In the meantime, Littlejohn says the marketing board will embark on strategic planning to define its services and budget after restructuring.He warns that a February letter from the Commission outlining a reduced service charge to producers, after restructuring takes place, doesn’t account for costs associated with the new marketing system. Producers must ensure “we receive value for our funding dollars,” he says. BF Needed: a new pork business model Pork board restructuring on minds of producers at London meeting
Grain Markets Climb on Weather and Supply Concerns Monday, August 17, 2026 Grain markets finished higher during the week ending August 14, 2026, as traders reacted to a supportive USDA August crop report, changing weather conditions across the U.S. Midwest, and continued geopolitical concerns affecting global grain supplies. The latest Farms.com Risk... Read this article online
National Citizens Inquiry hosting public ag hearings in Alberta Monday, August 17, 2026 An organization is hosting three days of conversations about agriculture in Alberta. The National Citizens Inquiry (NCI), an independent and citizen-led initiative launched in November 2022 to investigate Canadian government responses to COVID-19, is hosting “Are Farmers Safe in Canada?”... Read this article online
Canadian Ag Minister Works to Strengthen US Farm Trade Ties at Iowa State Fair Monday, August 17, 2026 Canada’s agriculture sector took center stage at one of America’s most recognized agricultural events as Agriculture and Agri-Food Minister Heath MacDonald travelled to the Iowa State Fair to promote closer ties between Canadian and U.S. farm industries. Joined by Canada’s Ambassador... Read this article online
Flash Drought Threat Grows Across Southern Plains as Historic El Niño Builds Monday, August 17, 2026 After flooding, a derecho, storms, and wildfire smoke, asignificant shift in North America's weather pattern is creating a new set of challenges for farmers, with forecasters warning that flash drought conditions are becoming a growing concern across key agricultural regions of the United... Read this article online
Woolwich Farmland Fight - Petition Urges Council to Protect Prime Ontario Agricultural Land Monday, August 17, 2026 A proposal to redesignate 107acres of agricultural land in Woolwich Township for employment and industrial development is drawing increasing opposition from residents and farmland advocates who say the project would come at the expense of valuable farmland and the region's agricultural... Read this article online