photo: David Whaley
by BETTER FARMING STAFF
After all the controversy this spring about producers in eastern Ontario seceding from the Ontario Wheat Producers Marketing Board, not a word was uttered at the annual meeting in Stratford Tuesday.
“We were prepared for it,” said chairman David Whaley, Essex County. Only one single resolution was on the floor (about the reaffirmation of its policy on genetically modified wheat), and Whaley says he expected a major discussion under the “new business” portion of the meeting “and nobody stepped forward.”
Controversial wheat board director John Vanderspank had already left the meeting. Earlier in the day, he said eastern Ontario farmers were busy combining their crop at home, and he left around 2 p.m. He said a custom operator was baling straw and he had to help him get bales off the field.
“What can you do? It’s dead. It’s the last meeting,” Vanderspank said.
Sometime this fall, the Ontario wheat board will be amalgamated with the marketing board representing soybean growers and the association representing corn producers to form Grain Farmers of Ontario. The date is “up to the minister” of agriculture, Leona Dombrowsky, Whaley says. “There is a lot of regulatory work to be done,” Whaley says.
The groups will go ahead, however, with a launch of the new organization’s brand in Guelph Sept. 1.
Vanderspank hopes the new organization will be more open than the old wheat board. He will not be one of the members of the transition team overseeing the amalgamation.
Vanderspank, who farms near Lanark, got into trouble with the wheat board when his comments were published in a local farm publication. The board said his comments were based on confidential discussions during board meetings. In May, the wheat board passed a non-confidence motion against Vanderspank and he was suspended from committee work.
An Aug. 10 email to Ontario Agriculture Minister Leona Dombrowsky, Whaley and other industry players signed by the district 10 producers asks for the district’s secession from the board, “effective immediately.”
It goes on to say “the checkoff fees will not be forwarded but may be held in trust in separate accounts by licenced elevators until such time as the new or old board can resolve these outstanding issues to the satisfaction of district 10 producers through a majority vote.”
Some eastern Ontario producers were upset because wheat board staff released producer information, before getting the board’s permission, to OnTrace Agri-food Traceability, a non-profit industry group that is developing a database to track food through the production chain. Eastern growers also complain that, as the only growers of hard spring wheat in the province, they are not served well by the marketing board.
District 10 represents Frontenac, Leeds, Lanark, Renfrew, Ottawa-Carleton, Grenville, Dundas, Stormont, Prescott, Glengarry, Russell and any other part of Ontario not included in the board’s other nine districts. BF
Comments
Free online dictionary se·cede (s-sd)
intr.v. se·ced·ed, se·ced·ing, se·cedes
To withdraw formally from membership in an organization, association, or alliance.
Typical of the board A little late and a dollar short most of the time
The "notice"not resolution was signed by the district 10 producers asks for the district’s secession from the board, “effective immediately.” W
Mr Whaley obviously is living in his own world.
#1 Annual meeting is held in the middle of spring wheat harvest Only 1 producer was present
#2 Nothing in agenda to entice eastern participation. Only winter wheat was discussed. No spring wheat plot data etc.Where are the eastern check-off dollars going. Reports marginalizing problems with spring wheat harvest.No combine. Only concern is assessing damages
#3 Secret board meetings
#4 Tuinema gone , Shapton on his way out. Only 3 wheat board directors invited to interim board.
#5 Sounds like an armed guard was in waiting to deal with any support for District 10
What part of boondoggle does Mister Whaley not understand.
AT
Post new comment