Canada wide grain grower coalition fighting research cuts

© AgMedia Inc.

 

‘Farmers have taken existing technology and advanced it as far as we can take it,’ says Grain Farmers of Ontario chair

Comments

Unfortunately, the claim by grain farmers about the dire need for the ability to produce more food, is neutralized by the fact that grain farmers seem equally adamant about the need to use that food for ethanol, instead of for food.

Therefore, when the farm groups claim the funding authority (NSERC) has a "disconnect from reality", the funding authority could easily respond that grains farmers are simply "the pot calling the kettle black".

Stephen Thompson, Clinton ON

AMMMMAN TRUE STATEMENT NO BELIEF IN FARM ORGANIZATIONS TAKE THEIR STABLE FUNDING AND POCKET THE CASH

Remarkable how every topic segues back to the usual rants.

blah blah blah...supply management is bad....blah blah blah ethanol is bad....

If I was even the least-bit wrong, about anything I post, you'd not only prove me wrong, but be proud to identify who you are, instead of hiding behind an electronic veil and "shooting the messenger"

I sign my name to my postings because I'm right - if you knew what you were talking about, and had something to say, you'd be able, and willing, to do the same thing.

Ironically, my experience is that for everyone who, like yourself, publicly accuses me of this, that, or the other, I consistently get about ten people telling me privately that I'm completely correct, and then some.

Stephen Thompson, Clinton ON

I think its terrific that someone who in one sentence of his post is railing against those hiding behind a veil of secrecy but in the next is telling us about his secret friends who support his views. Good thing we are not irony challenged.

I read your comments on all these issues and others and I think that you are exactly the problem with agriculture when something new comes it automatically bad and no matter what system is in place its bad as well in my opinion your way of thinking is old school. I'm a 30 year old crop farmer who started with nothing but a 100 acres of land now I'm farming around 1500ac of beans,wheat and corn I like when new industries like ethanol comes along and why not let it raise food prices everything else keeps going up i.e fuel,houses,automobiles just to name a few. I don't imagine corn prices are to popular with beef and hog farmers but if they could they would raise prices to. I hope the ethanol demand and food demand increase we as farmers can rise to occasion I know I'm for the challenge to feed and fuel the world. But I guess those that can, do and those that cant criticize.

I've been to the Farm Debt Review Board with people, not much older than you, who, when times were good, had the same attitude you do about their own superior management ability - yet when things went bad, it was always somebody else's fault.

And, funny thing too, when I was 30 in 1980, a whole lot of farmers my age said exactly the same thing you're saying about both themselves, and the generation older than them - yet almost all of the younger farmers with this attitude ended up losing their farms.

If I appear to be overly-critical, I have abundant good reason in that for over thirty years, I've been dealing with the human carnage caused by greed, ego, and short-sightedness in the farm community, and if I can prevent even one more person from ending up a blubbering wreck when, not if, things go bad, it's been worth it.

Stephen Thompson, Clinton ON

Businesses fail, excessive expansion is the cause of many of those failures. It's been that way as long as there have been businesses and will be that way long after you and I are laid to rest.

In my experience, by and large those who are bookkeepers are seldom especially entrepreneurial. Those with a knack for one seem to often not have a knack for the other. If you fixate on the risk its often hard to see the opportunity. Without risk there is seldom reward.

I have no more idea than you do whether the young fellow now farming 1500 acres is doing so in a sustainable way, while you see your role as keeping people from making business mistakes by reaching too far one might also ask how many you'll keep from not reaching at all.

Interesting Kenny says We need the A- base funding increased so we can 'attract' those researchers and keep them working on our issues.

Researchers baited by funding what a novel idea. What about "producers and production" baited by profit margins? or our youth attracted by a comparable living?

Comment modified by editors

"Kenney says he’s optimistic, however, and expects the council will see the error in this decision. “We’ll come at it together and we’ll approach the federal government on this issue, stronger than ever with the 100,000 members we represent with this coalition."

Kenny is a long way off the mark with only 40 at his local meeting today. Only 5 from the host county and 1 from the neighbor county. So where is all the enthusiasm for the 99960 other marchers with loud voices?

You mean only 40 farmers showed at the local grain growers meeting. Now there is a story BF should tackle, you think ?. There must have been a protesting army of tails raised skunks keepig the farmers away

"Kenney says he’s optimistic, however, and expects the council will see the error in this decision. “We’ll come at it together and we’ll approach the federal government on this issue, stronger than ever with the 100,000 members we represent with this coalition."

Kenny is a long way off the mark with only 40 at his local meeting today. Only 5 from the host county and 1 from the neighbor county. So where is all the enthusiasm for the 99960 other marchers with loud voices of political pursuation?

Post new comment

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Image CAPTCHA
We welcome thoughtful comments and ideas. Comments must be on topic. Cheap shots, unsubstantiated allegations, anonymous attacks or negativity directed against people and organizations will not be published. Comments are modified or deleted at the discretion of the editors. If you wish to be identified by name, which will give your opinion far more weight and provide a far greater chance of being published, leave a telephone number so that identity can be confirmed. The number will not be published.