Get it in writing, urges GFO

© AgMedia Inc.

Comments

The timelines tell the story - a resolution was passed by GFO delegates in March, yet it took three months to get a lawyer to produce a one page memo which reads like it was hastily-dictated over the phone while the lawyer was driving down the road in his car and sent to GFO before he had a chance to proof-read what he had dictated.

In addition, GFO's newsletter could just as easily have advised farmers to get written contracts without all the fear-mongering rhetoric provided by the lawyer GFO chose to retain.

If GFO needed a legal opnion at all, they could have obtained it three months ago instead of getting one at the 11th hour that did little more than pander to GFO's well-demonstrated penchant, as noted by Mr. Szabo, to fearmonger.

Producing a fear-mongering legal opinion based on incorrect assumptions about rules which hadn't been introduced at the time the memo was purportedly sent isn't, in my mind, responsible advocacy on either the part of the lawyer or GFO, and would seem to make abundantly clear that the scoundrels in the neonicotinoid farce are all somehow aligned with GFO rather than with the Premier's office.

Stephen Thompson, Clinton ON

Post new comment

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Image CAPTCHA
We welcome thoughtful comments and ideas. Comments must be on topic. Cheap shots, unsubstantiated allegations, anonymous attacks or negativity directed against people and organizations will not be published. Comments are modified or deleted at the discretion of the editors. If you wish to be identified by name, which will give your opinion far more weight and provide a far greater chance of being published, leave a telephone number so that identity can be confirmed. The number will not be published.