Pigeon King’s northern roost sold

© AgMedia Inc.

Property brought $225,000 for creditors of bankrupt businessman who owed them millions

 

Comments

Let me see if I understand this correctly - there is somewhere around $54 million in claims against Galbraith, yet PKI investors are fixated on a property that sold for $225,000, but probably will net creditors almost literally nothing once real estate fees and bankruptcy trustee fees, not to mention any back taxes, are paid.

All of this goes to show that PKI investors were not only not very shrewd investors, they are also sore losers

"ALL OF THIS GOES TO SHOW THAT INVESTORS WERE NOT ONLY SHREWD INVESTORS, THEY ARE ALSO SORE LOSERS?" ITS TOO BAD WE CAN NOT SEE WHO AUTHORS THESE COMMENTS, IT SOUNDS TO ME AS THOUGH ONLY ARLAN HIMSELF WOULD BE CAPABLE OF WRITING SOMETHING SO INSENSITVE. THIS WHOLE AFFAIR INVOLVING THE ETHICS AND BANKRUPCTY OF PIGEON KING HAS BEEN A SHAMBLES. THE TRUSSTEE IN BANKRUPCTY WILL BE CERTAIN TO COLLECT ALL THE MONEY THEY FEEL THAT THEY ARE OWED.THE GOV'T WILL COLLECT THEIR TAXES AND THE POLICE HAVE STILL NOT LAID ANY CHARGES. NOW, TO ADD INSULT TO INJURY, THE WHEREABOUTS OF ARLAN GAILBRAITH ARE REPORTED TO BE UNKNOWN. YOU MAY CALL THE INVESTORS SORE LOSERS, TO ME IT SOUNDS LIKE THEY ARE DISTRAUGHT, DISCOURAGED AND FRUSTRATED!!!

CrimeBustersNow

Too bad the victims don't take a cue from the Madoff Ponzi scam and other Ponzi scams "South of the Boarder" and sue the authorities who were told repeatedly this was a Ponzi scheme. And notwithstanding being told and mounds of evidence and leads given to them, nonetheless a W. R. Fraud Detective insisted on appearing on CTV assuring the world they "could find nothing illegal in this scam" which encouraged a predicable serge of new victims for the December 2007 deadline Galbraith had set for the best "by-back" price.

And CBC gratuitously stated to the world.... "This is clearly legal in Canada." Who was "yanking their chains???" One might muse.

What a tangled web etc, etc, etc,

And banks (many blindsided by the personnel at Galbraith's bank who should have suspected something on their own and certainly after I called; made personal appearances at the bank, wrote an email, then when ignored, posted it to the W.W.Web) continued to loan millions, also blindsided by the BBB's "A1" rating (given out to companies like candy at a piñata bashing) until two days after PKI collapsed and I personally contacted and "chewed out" the BBB.

Against all this perceived "credibility" I was working diligently to shut down this abhorrent, mathematically doomed Ponzi scheme. Ten of millions of dollars and continued misery could have been adverted even at that juncture.

I believe many victims have a solid case against authorities and others with a fiduciary duty.

That's the truth without doubt.... And that's the reality as I see it!

dave CBNOw

Post new comment

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Image CAPTCHA
We welcome thoughtful comments and ideas. Comments must be on topic. Cheap shots, unsubstantiated allegations, anonymous attacks or negativity directed against people and organizations will not be published. Comments are modified or deleted at the discretion of the editors. If you wish to be identified by name, which will give your opinion far more weight and provide a far greater chance of being published, leave a telephone number so that identity can be confirmed. The number will not be published.