by SUSAN MANN
A group composed of farmers and others studying pollinator health has proposed establishing one million acres of self-sustaining habitat on public lands and private farmland as part of its Ontario Pollinator Health Blueprint.
The Pollinator Task Force, assembled by Grain Farmers of Ontario, publicly released the blueprint Monday after forwarding a copy to Ontario’s agriculture ministry late last week, says Mark Brock, Grain Farmers chair. So far, the government hasn’t responded to the task force’s proposals, he notes.
Ontario government officials couldn’t be reached for comment.
UPDATE TUES. MARCH 10, 2015: In a statement released at 9 p.m. yesterday, Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Jeff Leal said nearly 52,000 written submissions were received during the consultation period for the province’s Pollinator Health Action Plan and more than 400 people participated in consultation sessions.
“Evaluation of the feedback we received is ongoing, with current estimates showing 97 per cent of submissions in support of the proposal.
“There will be another opportunity for consultation, once the proposed regulation is made public in the coming weeks.” END OF UPDATE
Brock doesn’t think the blueprint will make the government “change their course. I think they do have some goals in mind that they’re going to go forward with. But there might be some opportunities to shape some of those goals with our plan.”
In November 2014 the government proposed implementing a regulatory system to restrict the sale and use of neonicotinoid seed treatments for corn and soybeans under the Ontario Pesticides Act. Public consultations closed Jan. 25. Grain Farmers and others oppose the government’s proposal.
Regulations are slated to be in place for July 1.
Brock says the idea of the pollinator habitat is to “create an environment and forage habitat for honey bees and wild pollinators.” For example on his farm, there are a couple of acres in a corner that’s difficult for him to get at. “I’d be willing to take some of that land and plant it to pollinator-friendly plants.”
The proposal calls for the creation of pollinator habitats in Ontario providing a sequence of continuous blooms throughout the seasons. A pollinator habitat registry would “capture community pollinator programs and identify pollinator habitat locations.” There could also be a fencerow recovery program, community-directed habitat incentive along with public land rehabilitation programs.
Brock says during the task force’s information gathering sessions this winter, “there was an overarching commitment by grains and oilseeds producers to help create that habitat.” But the idea for the proposal is to be flexible and not make it mandatory for farmers to keep sections of their farms in pollinator-friendly habitats forever.
The Ontario Beekeepers’ Association wants the government to stay on track with its original proposal. Association executive committee member and head of its issues management committee Dennis Edell says there are some nice ideas in the Pollinator Task Force’s proposal but the government first needs to reduce the amount of corn and soybean acreage grown with the pesticide-treated seeds.
Edell says neonicotinoid-treated seeds are used in almost all of the corn and 65 per cent of the soybean acres across Ontario “when in fact it may not even be needed” on all those acres.
As the government prepares proposed regulations, Edell says the beekeepers’ association is watching to ensure the plan to reduce the acreage planted with neonicotinoid-treated seeds by 80 per cent by 2017 is actually implemented.
Although the pollinator task force also calls for a reduction in the volume of neonicotinoid-treated seeds, it doesn’t list a number. Brock says “the reason why we didn’t use a number is sometimes people become so focused on the number they lose sight of the intent of the objective.” The task force’s objective in developing its blueprint “is to make sure there’s an improvement in pollinator health that still allows us to use the (neonicotinoid) seed treatment.”
Edell says anything that delays the government from launching its restrictions this year is “another year of bees’ exposure to neonicotinoids and there’s going to be more residues in the ground that are going to affect bees,” he says.
Edell notes the Ontario public supports the position of the beekeepers association. In a March 5 press release, the beekeepers association says 97 per cent of the 50,000 responses the government received as part of its consultation to reduce neonicotinoid-treated seed acreage in Ontario were in favour of the government’s plan. Edell says the numbers came from the provincial agriculture ministry.
Meanwhile the task force looking into pollinator health is made up of Grain Farmers representatives, beekeepers, a certified crop adviser, an agricultural product retailer representative and a seed company official. The task force consulted with more than 900 farmers and received many presentations from stakeholder groups. The Blueprint outlines five key areas to enhance pollinator health in Ontario including:
- Habitat and nutrition.
- Pesticide exposure.
- Disease and parasites.
- Communication between beekeepers and farmers.
- Obtaining benchmarking data to determine pollinator and managing bee health along with farm pest threshold data.
To reduce the risk of pesticide exposure outside the hive, the pollinator task force recommends a “point of purchase” verification system for all purchases of insecticide treated seed that’s subject to audits. The task force also recommends:
- Mandatory training and licensing under the Grower Pesticide Safety course for all farmers who buy neonicotinoid-treated seed.
- Mandatory installation of equipment modifications on negative-air planters used to plant neonicotinoid-treated seeds to reduce dust emissions.
- Registration of all farms using neonicotinoid-treated seeds on Driftwatch. This voluntary communication tool, developed in the United States, enables crop producers, beekeepers and pesticide applicators to work together to protect specialty crops and apiaries.
- Transparent seed treatment pricing and education programs to ensure all farmers have access to untreated seed.
One way to reduce the risk of bee exposure to neonicotinoids is for seed companies to reduce the amount of the pesticide they put on the seeds. Brock says seed companies are already implementing those cuts. “I think we need to talk more about about a volume measurement of usage and not an acreage measure.”
There’s also a commitment to the idea of “using it (neonicotinoids) where we need to,” he explains.
The seed treatment is valuable to farmers because it enables them to use environmentally friendly farming practices, such as no-till, minimum tillage and cover crop planting to mitigate soil erosion, Brock says. Using no-till and minimum tillage also helps farmers to reduce their carbon dioxide emissions and minimize their impact on the environment. BF
Comments
The Grain Farmers of Ontario (GFO) is still dreaming in technicolour by seeming to not be prepared to admit that neonicotinoids are in any way responsible for bee deaths - and, as such, their blueprint is an exercise in futility as well as a cruel hoax.
In addition, the proposal to create small plots of natural habitat is nothing more than highly-visible tokenism because it:
(A) does nothing to address the damage caused by neonicotinoids on the vast tracts of land elsewhere.
(B) does nothing to reduce the use of neonicotinoids.
GFO is still being obstructionist, but seem to have softened their resolve to be martyrs - unfortunately, they've still got a long way to go to be either responsible or credible.
Stephen Thompson, Clinton ON
Stephen Thompson 100% right The GFO I feel should be taking the lead as this is very big issue among the urban population. The GFO is not acting in a responsible way. The GFO. needs to learn something about PR from 9 years ago at queens park
Still would like someone to explain how supposedly fewer Ontario Bee's in 2014 produced 2 million pounds more honey than in 2013 ? (Statistics Canada)
were the fewer Bee's on steriods ? I am sure the Beekeepers Association has an answer.
Beekeepers are constantly splitting their hives and purchasing packaged bees trying to stay in business. It’s like buying a car that’s a lemon, you’re constantly throwing money at it but eventually it will bankrupt you, so you get rid of it. That’s what is happening with the beekeepers, their yearly losses are not sustainable and they will go out of business, unless you are willing to pay $100 for a pound of honey.
Bill
These farmers are just not getting it, they cannot contain these deadly toxins on their property and end up contaminating rivers and streams none target fields and plants causing all kinds of damage which makes this issue everyone’s problem! There is little choice but to decrease their use by implementing restrictions. They should be glad it’s not a total ban.
Prophylactic is defined as defending or protecting from pests. So, all of a sudden, the precautionary approach has fallen out of favour with anti-pesticide activists ?!?! A prophylactic rule is a carefully-crafted rule that protects crops from damaging pests. The notion of the prophylactic rule is controversial only to pesticide-hating fanatical-activists who have NO expertise, NO training, and NO education in matters concerning crop protection or pest control products. But, these fanatics DO have an over-riding agenda to prohibit pest control products, despite the fact that they have been assessed to be scientifically-safe and have been proven to cause no harm.
“A prophylactic rule is a carefully-crafted rule that protects crops from damaging pests” Wrong! If it was carefully crafted you wouldn’t be treating all the seeds now would you? And if you were to apply the precautionary principle these toxins would be long gone.
Proof with the previous post that prophylatics don't always work !
NORAHG OPPOSES THE ONTARIO PROPOSAL THAT WILL RECKLESSLY PROHIBIT AGAINST IRREPLACEABLE NEONICOTINOID INSECTICIDES ― FANATICAL & ARBITRARY PROHIBITION MUST BE STOPPED, FOREVER !
On November 25th, 2014, Ontario’s government officials proposed a province-wide prohibition against neonicotinoid insecticides desperately needed by the agriculture industry. http://tinyurl.com/o3tf4sv Fanatical officials and activists are falsely alleging that these insecticides, desperately needed by the agriculture industry, are the cause of so-called bee colony collapse disorder ― in fact, bee losses occur because some bee-keepers may be wholly unsuited to be raising bees. Overall, there is NO bee crisis in Ontario because of insecticides, and ANY prohibition is NOT necessary ! Government officials under the Liberal Party, and bee conspiracy terrorists, are NOT credible sources of real scientific information upon which this political decision about prohibition can be made. It is inescapable that the allegations against neonicotinoid insecticides are FALSE ! If we had less conventional neonicotinoid use in Ontario, we would still have bee colony collapse disorder, because many bee-keepers are NOT competent to manage their hives. FORGET ABOUT A #@!!% USELESS POLLINATOR BLUEPRINT ! There is NO other recourse but litigation and complaints ! SUE THE #@!!% SOBs’ BRAINS OUT ! CropLife Canada, Grain Farmers of Ontario, and all agricultural businesses, must sue the neonicotinoid-hating SOBs’ brains out ! They must stop the proposed prohibition in Ontario, whatever the cost may be ! They must demand that the proposed fanatical prohibition be stopped, forever. For more information, go to The Pesticide Truths Web-Site ... http://wp.me/p1jq40-8FZ We are the National Organization Responding Against HUJE that seek to destroy the Green space and other industries ( NORAH G ). We are dedicated to reporting PESTICIDE FREE FAILURES, as well as the work of RESPECTED and HIGHLY RATED EXPERTS who promote ENVIRONMENTAL REALISM and PESTICIDE TRUTHS. Get the latest details at http://pesticidetruths.com/ http://pesticidetruths.com/toc/ http://wp.me/P1jq40-2rr https://www.facebook.com/norah.gfon WILLIAM H GATHERCOLE AND NORAH G
SUE THE #@!!% SOBs’ BRAINS OUT ! ( Blog )
http://pesticidetruths.com/2014/11/28/the-agriculture-industry-is-under-...
A tell-tale sign of a fanatic is that he/she seems compelled to blame the victim, and the above poster does that, and then some, when he wrote - "... many bee keepers are NOT competent to manage their hives." as well as - "In fact, bee losses occur because some bee keepers may be wholly unsuited to be raising bees."
Unfortunately, Mr. Gathercole's strident "blame the victim" rhetoric seems to be all-too-common among pro-neonicotinoid advocates and is exactly why the campaign to keep neonicotinoid use at its present level is doomed to fail and rightfully (as well as thankfully) so.
Finally, while I rail against anonymous postings on this site, the above posting demonstrates exactly why a few postings really should remain anonymous.
Stephen Thompson, Clinton ON
They have the right to their perspective,they are maybe just not as well funded as another fanatic group is,the Sierra Club.
While farmers are overly-quick to claim that the actions of those who support partial restrictions on the use of neonicotinoids are fanatics, that "door swings both ways".
For example, the actions of the Grain Farmers of Ontario (GFO) to date in this matter, while, in the narrowest sense possibly not fanaticism, are, nonetheless, textbook examples of how to bungle a public relations exercise - what with:
(1) urging farmers to boycott the public participation process
(2) issuing a statement claiming they will refuse to have any part of helping government implement a policy which they believe to be fundamentally flawed
(3) running a full-page ad claiming -
(A) "...that we, the 28,000 farm families in Ontario" which ignored the fact
that the combined membership of the OFA, the CFFO and the NFU is about 40,000 farm families, thereby being disengenuous at best about the support they have in the farm community.
(B) trying to infer that since honey bee colony numbers have increased by 60% since 2003, neonicotinoids are safe, but all the while ignoring the scientific truth that any increase (or decrease) in the number of hives has absolutely nothing to do with what goes on inside those hives.
Given that 97% of the submissions received by government appear to favour neonicotinoid restrictions, it appears that GFO's well-financed fearmongering campaign has been a colossal failure and, if anything, it has cost the GFO a tremendous amount of political capital and public goodwill, or to look at it in another way, GFO's well-funded "fanaticism" has cost them both the battle and the war.
Stephen Thompson, Clinton ON
Every one should limit neonicotinoid use until we find out what can be done to reduce bee losses.
Post new comment