Rate of growth in agricultural land values is slowing

© AgMedia Inc.

Description (Tag): 

Comments

The lowest yielding stock I own is TD bank at 3.38%, which is just under $575.00 on seventeen grand, which an acre of land cannot generate. The highest yielder I own is Canadian oil sands at 11.78%. You can do the math.

If one already owns a few farms, there is not much point in parking profits in more land as you will already have taken advantage of future capital gains tax exemptions.
Many farmer
s like to defer taxes so they purchase properties that don't make money in hope that they will appreciate like they have in the past 30 years, which is unlikely since most of those increases are a result of interest declining by about 17%
The government has a tool for defering taxes, it is called an RRSP.
Inside an RRSP you can put blue chip companies like TransCanada for example that have a history of increasing dividends yearly and the shares will continue to rise ahead of what little inflation there is.

Raube Beuerman

Just to refresh our memories Raube, how much ag land did you say you still own.

Just enough to make use of capital gains in the future. 2 farms.

Think I already made that point.

Raube Beuerman

So are you licenced or should people take your advice keeping in mind what they paid for it ?
Had a guy tell me that a farm would never be worth a million dollars . He then went on to say that he could make me more money with investments than any farm would ever appreciate in value . I told him to prove it to me with his own money first then I asked him why he still owned a farm !

Coments like yours help those who own bank shares sleep better at night.

Keep buying, I like the dividends you provide for me.

Raube Beuerman

When, not if Rates rise, will have an immediate impact on land values, I suspect a lot of farmland will be on the market quickly.

Interest rates are determined by bond yields, right now the USA is 2.1% for a 10 year, and Canada is 1.45%
The basket case of Greece is over 9%, but no sane person would go there.
I truly believe we will not see rates rise more than 2% for at least 20 years.

I also think it will be difficult for the Government and Central banks to maintain their target of 2% inflation going forward.

Raube Beuerman

I guess I m just old ,I can remember 1980 s rates of 20%. Seems hard to believe how things have changed, but change is the one thing we can always count on in our life times. I had a young lady from FCC tell me some of her clients could not stand a 2% raise in rates with the amount of money they owe.

Farmland evaluation experts have been warning about a bubble in farmland valuations for decades.

At $20,000 per acre, what crops can you grow that will consistently yield more than the 3% produced by a GIC, with no work involved?

For the first time in 28 years, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago released its AgLetter report that good US cropland values dropped 3% in 2014 in the Mid-West (see http://farmpolicy.com/2015/02/12/farmland-values-federal-reserve-banks-o... ).

As reported here, the Ontario experts have already seen stresses in the Ontario farmland market.

The Canadian residential real estate market has also started a slow melt in value that likely will continue for the next 30 years, taking off at least 30% (to as must as 80%) of the current value according to international and national experts.

Will farmland values in Ontario and the rest of Canada soon follow suit?

Only time will tell.

Glenn Black
Small Flock Poultry Farmers of Canada

At these prices for farmland, the best comparison is to gold which has almost no value in use.

Therefore, farmers are buying land for the same reason people buy gold, and that's the expectation of/for capital appreciation only.

There was a time FCC wouldn't lend more than 75% of the agricultural productive value (APV) of land which now would roughly translate into something like $3,000 per acre.

Everyone interested in sound agricultural policy should regret the day FCC stopped lending on APV and should regret even more the day FCC started taking quota as security.

We are indeed living in a "fool's paradise" and will pay dearly for ignoring sound investment principles - we paid dearly in the early 1980s for allowing our inflationary expectations to get ahead of common sense in the late 1970s, yet we seem to have learned nothing from that debacle.

Stephen Thompson, Clinton ON

Post new comment

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Image CAPTCHA
We welcome thoughtful comments and ideas. Comments must be on topic. Cheap shots, unsubstantiated allegations, anonymous attacks or negativity directed against people and organizations will not be published. Comments are modified or deleted at the discretion of the editors. If you wish to be identified by name, which will give your opinion far more weight and provide a far greater chance of being published, leave a telephone number so that identity can be confirmed. The number will not be published.