Photo at right: Wilma Jeffray
© AgMedia Inc
by BETTER FARMING STAFF
The names of producers who petitioned for the Ontario Farm Products Marketing Commission hearing into Ontario Pork’s marketing powers are going to be made public before further proceedings continue.
On Friday, Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal vice-chair Marthanne Robson ordered the Farm Products Marketing Commission to release the names of producers who signed the request for a hearing over four days in Guelph in July last summer that ultimately resulted in the Commission’s Oct. 6 decision to end the marketing board’s monopoly powers.
“There is merit in the Tribunal comparing the number of pork producers involved in the appeals before it and the number of pork producers requesting the original reconsideration of Regulation 419,” says a Notice of Motion prepared by agent Elbert van Donkersgoed on behalf of producer Rein Minnema, who is appealing the Commission’s decision.
Sara Blake, counsel for the Farm Products Marketing Commission, told Robson privacy laws did not prevent the names from being released. The Commission had declined earlier media requests for the names.
Ontario Pork has been asking the Commission for the names of the producers who signed the original petition from the beginning, says Wilma Jeffray, Belmore, new chair of the marketing board. “We’ve always been denied the request,” she says.
“There have been a lot of producers at meetings who wanted to know the names on the letter … If there is something that isn’t fully illuminated, there is always, rightly or wrongly, a perception that something is hidden. This will help make the process more transparent,” she said. BF
Comments
YOU CAN RUN BUT YOU CAN NOT HIDE
Has the FPMC been ordered by the Tribunal to produce just the letter and signatures
Or
Any? / all? documents that Farm Products, its staff and commission members may have in their possession including the correspondence and emails between the Commission members, the Commission Staff, and the Ontario Pork Directors who so obviously guided those original signatories on how to skirt due process, and force a hearing before Farm Products without appealing decisions of Ontario Pork to the Tribunal.
In a normal legal action everything must be filed.
We will find that Farm Products and its legal staff will interpret this order of the Tribunal much the same as they have interpreted the issue of a stay, Farm Products will do as it pleases and only provide limited, if any information. They are above the law.
Post new comment