Dundalk fertilizer facility sparks concerns, questions – and support

© AgMedia Inc.

A Grey County farmer says he’d use a proposed fertilizer product made locally from biosolids but local residents and environmentalists oppose the facility

Comments

Maureen Reilly's opinion is based on facts. Whereas Kevin Litwiller's sales pitch is based on the thermophilic test for fecal coliform inhibiting the growth activity of most gram negative Enterobacteriaceae that ferment lactose. While most Enterobacteriaceae in sludge go dormant under high stress conditions such as he describes, once released into the environment they may reactivate and cause odors. Furthermore, other bacteria not included in the testing are far more difficult to inactivate. Moreover, the thing to keep in mind is that the guidelines are put in place to protect the dumpers from liability, not the farmers land and health. for further information, see "MYTHS PROMOTED TO SELL OR GIVE AWAY SLUDGE AND/OR RECYCLED WATER". http://thewatchers.us/myths/sludge-myths.html

Jim Bynum, vp
Help for Sewage Victims

Where does all that crap ends up anyways in the rivers and lakes.Why not throw some on field crops for nonfood crops in moderation, can,t be any worst off than straight into our drinking water and water we all get to enjoy.

Thousands of careful research investigations have shown that organic matter recycled from waste water treatment facilities significantly improves soil and crops and that risks from pollutants and microbes are very low. This organic matter is processed from material that comes from everyone in the community, is full of nutrients that passed through people first, and, when dried, is in a form that has proved free of microbial risks. You can verify the scientific soundness of recycling through reports issued by the Water Environment Research Foundation and by agricultural research universities. Importantly, public waste water facilities have an opportunity to support the local economy in making the nutrients collected during sewage treatment available free or at low cost to nearby farmers. Your local treatment plant managers are committed to public health and environmental quality, and this valuable recycling program is an expression of that commitment.

Bill Toffey
Mid-Atlantic Biosolids Association

Farmers contemplating using sewage sludge products-- no matter how treated-would be wise to get factual and recent science-based information about this risky practice, information not provided by the industry that profits from land application.

Sludge is not just human waste; it contains a vast array of industrial pollutants, many of which are highly toxic and persistent, can leach into ground water, or end up in the food chain. Every industry , business, hospital, or metal plating shop that is connected to sewers, can legally pipe much of their hazardous waste into sewage treatment plants. Here these pollutants, together with viable pathogens, are REMOVED from the waste water, only to CONCENTRATE in the resulting sludge. No economical process exists that can remove these pollutants.

A recent court ordered the US Department of Agriculture to compensate a dairy farmer whose land was permanently poisoned by repeated sludge applications so he no longer could grow crops. In addition, his prize winning dairy herd was wiped out when hundreds of cows became sick and died after ingesting forage grown on the contaminated land.

Farmers and land owners are liable if wells get polluted, neighbors get sick, or animals die as a result of sludge use. In addition their and their neighbor's property becomes devalued. Is the short-term yield increase, caused by the nitrogen and water in sludge worth the long-term DECREASE in yields? Both the US and Canadian regulations permit cumulative pollutant loading of soils, until there is a 50% yield reduction.

After becoming fully informed about the risks, and not just the short-term benefits of using sludge on their crops, farmers might end up agreeing with their neighbors, many farm groups, major produce processing companies, and non-industry funded experts, that using biosolids is not such a good idea. For more information, visit
www.sludgefacts.org

Caroline Snyder Ph.D.
Professor Emeritus
Rochester Institute of Technology (NY)

The David Suzuki Foundation is opposing sewage sludge spreading - treated or otherwise - on farmland.

John Werring spoke for the Suzuki Foundation on radio. It is an excellent interview and can be heard at

http://www.bayshorebroadcasting.ca/downloads/audio/open_line_a_-_lystek....

.......................................................

Here is the Lystek presentation that is causing much concern - do the numbers add up?

http://www.lystek.com/en/media/DundalkOMRCPresentation.pdf

Lystek Operations report:

http://commonground-spirg.squarespace.com/storage/Lystek%20Design%20and%...

.......................................................

Questions:

Why hook up to the local sewage plant?

Why is the proposed Lystek plant planning to hook up to the Dundalk sewage treatment plant?

Since the Lystek facility's purpose is to process sludge and septage, surely it should treat its own septage. There is no need for them to hook up to the local sewer plant.

( The concern is this: will Lystek be taking a tipping fee for materials they then pipe down to the municipal plant?)

Where will all the water to dilute the sewage sludge and run the plant come from? How much water will they

use for each operation requiring water?

They say they will bring in 43,000 tonnes of sludge and septage a year yet send out 50,000 tonnes of finished 'product'.

What is this extra 7,000 tonnes of material?

If its water...where will they get the millions of litres of water? Can the local watershed stand to have millions of litres shipped away from local groundwater and streams?

These are their figures for year one of operations.

At full scale multiply these numbers by about 4.

Hazardous materials

They say there are to be no hazardous materials on site.

Isn't potassium hydroxide a hazardous material? Isn't sodium hydroxide hazardous?

How many truck loads of these materials will come in every month?

Stormwater

Stormwater on site will be held in a stormwater trench then released to flow offsite. What quality standard will this water be required to meet? How often will it be tested?

Land base of farms needed - 6,000 to 24,000 acres of land will be needed for spreading (at the CFIA label application rate limit)

In year one they plan to distribute 50,000 tonnes of low viscosity processed sewage sludge - what they plan to register as "Low Analysis Farm Fertilizer"- to farms in a 20 to 30 kilometer radius. But the maximum application rate according to their fertilizer label is 4 tonnes per hectare. Over 6,000 acres will be needed in the first year. Soils in the area are already alkaline. Why would they need more alkalinity?

Low Nutrient Analysis

Normally fertilizers in Canada must have over 24% major crop nutrients: nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium. Since Lystek material does not meet this standard (it is either 6% or 9% or 10% nutrient NPK depending on which piece of their literature you read) it is registered as a "Low Analysis Farm Fertilizer". In other words it is a low nutrient material. Why does Lystek describe their material as a high nutrient fertilizer? Is this legal?

Viscosity

The material is low viscosity - so that it flows easily through the hoses and tynes when being pumped into the soil.

But that means it will also flow easily down through the soil profile - down toward groundwater. It will move swiftly into and through tile drains into surface water. The company claims the viscosity moves sludge from 2,000,000 cP down to 6,000 cP.

But low viscosity is not what you want in a fertilizer. Just the opposite. You want fertilizer to stay in the root zone, not move easily in the soil. Will the low viscosity mean that toxic compounds in the processed sludge fertilizer will move more easily into crops and into groundwater?

Application Rate

According to Lystek : "Lystek processed materials can meet all of these fertilizer demands without any practical limitation to annual application rates to land". They plan to create a material that is ultimately not regulated under the Ontario Nutrient Management Act. Does this statement mean that they do not intend to respect limits to the agricultural application rates for their product?

Local impacts, food impacts

The local community is understandably concerned about the impact of the plant on their quality of life, and food consumers should be concerned that 50,000 to 200,000 tonnes per year of material with chemicals, toxic metals, and pharmaceuticals is headed to the soil where we grow our food.

Maureen Reilly
Sludge Watch

The majority of tax payers in Southgate Twp are NOT "willing hosts" to the proposed biosolids plant for many many reasons, such as odours, toxins, chemicals, drugs and heavy metals polluting the soil and waterways. Unfortunately, Southgate Twp council has not been transparent; there has been no public consultations; they are not interested in the scientific facts about human and industrial sludge; it seems like a lot of decision making has been conducted behind closed doors!
Katie Harrison
Southgate Ratepayer

We are seriously considering the purchase of a property that is only a few thousand feet from the proposed Fertilizer Plant site. We intend to use the property as a horse farm requiring pasture and hay to be grown on the land. We have never seen a fertilizer plant and do not know EXACTLY what is does to the air quality in the immediate area. The above info is certainly alarming with regard to the land. Is there ANY chance that the plant will not be built?
**NB Editor - I'd prefer not to give names since we are literally at the offer stage of buying the property and this has only just been brought to our attention. We have a small hatch to escape through.......

I don't know if living near the facility will be good or bad. My only comment is this...if in the future you need or want to sell the property will you be able to do so? You, yourself have doubts, or you would not have placed a comment on this site.
Pretty much anything can be sold so long as the price is low enough. So keep that in mind if you are buying this place.

Post new comment

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Image CAPTCHA
We welcome thoughtful comments and ideas. Comments must be on topic. Cheap shots, unsubstantiated allegations, anonymous attacks or negativity directed against people and organizations will not be published. Comments are modified or deleted at the discretion of the editors. If you wish to be identified by name, which will give your opinion far more weight and provide a far greater chance of being published, leave a telephone number so that identity can be confirmed. The number will not be published.