Investors in Arlan Galbraith’s alleged pigeon Ponzi scheme fail to show for prosecutor’s meeting

© AgMedia Inc.

‘Victim fatigue’ may be one reason only 10 out of a possible 917 people attended a victims’ meeting this week and three of those who did participate were former employees of Pigeon King International

Photo: Arlan Galbraith

Comments

We had several Amish neighbors getting ready to send their life savings or about to get loans to get in on this deal.
Pigion King targeted the Amish in Wi. I am sure they were targeted in other States as well. The Amish won't go to court. Too bad.

Investors i.e. farmers must have had sun in there eyes if they believed that the PKI was a viable , long term venture. I was even more shocked when I seen that some pretty (i assumed) intelligent business men bought into the plan.
Money and greed is what makes ponzi schemes work as everyone hopes there is another sucker too buy into it and if you are early investor the rewards are great

Why is it assumed that investors in Pigeon King International were either greedy or stupid. I can assure the "Can't fix stupid" writer that my wife and I were neither greedy or stupid. We did not enter into this scheme with the intention of getting rich. We researched the claims put forward by Pigeon King, we talked to other farmers. We beleived ... The entire plan by Arlan Gailbraith was cleverly concocted. Many respected and successful neighbours of ours fell victim to this alleged ponzi scheme as well. To determine whether or not Arlan Gailbraith's intentions were pure, you have only to ask yourself, "did he or did he not have a use or end market for these birds"? The answer is very simple, NO,he did NOT. Without a legitimate end market for these pigeons, every dollar he took from new unsuspecting investors was a dollar he KNEW they would NEVER get back. MY PHONE NUMBER:

Comment modified by editors for libel and to delete phone number.

I agree, you can't fix stupid. The author of this post looks quite stupid himself.... spelling and grammar mistakes. And to assume that people didn't know that this wasn't a viable long term venture...no risk, no reward. Life is a gamble, my friend. Oh, and to assume that the were all men? Try again. Intelligent farmers are women as well.

If Galbraith's financial reward was $50,000 annually, his "take" of the $20 million put up by investors, was only about half a million dollars.

In addition, since early investors profited from their investment, while later investors lost theirs, both the victims and the beneficiaries of this Ponzi scheme appeared to be farmers, rather than Galbraith himself.

I'd be thinking that if I was an early investor, and made out like a bandit, while my neighbour, who was a later investor, lost his house, I'd be wanting to stay anonymous too.

Once again, so much for the nonsense that we, in the farm community, are "all in it together".

Stephen Thompson, Clinton ON

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
We welcome thoughtful comments and ideas. Cheap shots, unsubstantiated allegations or anonymous attacks against people and organizations will not be published. Comments are modified or deleted at the discretion of the editors. If you wish to be identified by name, which will give your opinion far more weight and provide a far greater chance of being published, leave a telephone number so that identity can be confirmed. The number will not be published.

© AgMedia Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.