Pigeon King failure triggers one of the largest fraud investigations in Waterloo history

© AgMedia Inc.

Police ramp up an investigation into fraud allegations concerning a failed Waterloo, Ontario-based pigeon breeding scheme and its founder.

Comments

This is best news I have heard in a long time

2008 has been an extremely trying and difficult year. Reading the headlines this morning regarding the decision to proceed against Arlan Gailbraith is the best news I could possibly have hoped for.
I won't be critical of the fact that it has taken the police and the crown 7 months to come to this decision, I am just glad they arrived at the decision they did. I encourage all the Pigeon King Investors and victims to co operate fully with the authorities and may justice be served.

This is the best news and the way to get the New Year started off. We are glad to hear that those investigating this case were able to see that many innocent people became victims of PKI.
We will welcome the RCMP to continue it's investigation south of the border and also offer our help while they are in the U.S.

Good for the Police - its a little overdue, but a big step in the right direction

The difficulties PKI created for many individuals has been tragic. It is good to see that there is some very concerted effort to fully investigate and serve justice. It is unfortunate that so many were harmed.

It does not take two University courses and months of searches to understand that PKI was in technical bankruptcy from day one as soon as its first contract was signed.

Money in for pigeons: $500
Money out per year: $500

Duration of 1 contract: 10 years
$500 X 10 = $5 000

Total money in: $500
Total money out: $5000

So... Galbraith could pay you back for only 1 year with your own money. After that, there was no money left at all.

The only way to continue was to find newcomers to pay the first investors, using Paul's money to pay Pierre, and so on...

Simple!

Michel

Post new comment

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Image CAPTCHA
We welcome thoughtful comments and ideas. Comments must be on topic. Cheap shots, unsubstantiated allegations, anonymous attacks or negativity directed against people and organizations will not be published. Comments are modified or deleted at the discretion of the editors. If you wish to be identified by name, which will give your opinion far more weight and provide a far greater chance of being published, leave a telephone number so that identity can be confirmed. The number will not be published.