Soybean patent to expire this year

© AgMedia Inc.

Those planning on saving seed from this year’s Roundup Ready soybean crop better rethink their strategy, warns a Monsanto representative

photo: Erin Romeo

Comments

And then the other shoe to drop... I'm told that no seed companies in Canada intend to sell RR soybean seed in 2012, so you won't be able to buy it to grow your seed from. They will only be selling RR2Y. Which is why (I'm told) no seed growers have been contracted to grow RR seed in 2011.

Comment deleted by editors

Let's say no companies sell the seed. The next year may be out, but if this seed turns up in the years 2013, 2014, 2015, etc. will they be legal? If not, this seems like a perpetual patent.

No. If you can't legally buy seed to grow in 2012, any seed grown after that will be deemed to have been saved illegally, unless some seed company breaks ranks and sells RR seed for growth in 2012.

It's not a perpetual patent per se, just recognition that they don't have to sell you the seed after the patent expires so you're out of luck

That's also why your seed dealer is going to be doing their best to make sure your unplanted seed in 2011 is returned to the company, as it's supposed to have been every year before (according to the TUA) but they never followed up on it before.

There are a handful of farmers in the U.S. who have managed to keep Monsanto soybean pollen from contaminating their soybeans crops. I would urge everyone to buy seeds from these people and loosen Monsanto's strangle hold on the soybean industry. As far as I'm concerned Monsanto should be paying damages to all the farmers whose crops were contaminated by the genetically modified roundup ready soybean pollen from the farm next door. Soybean should be on the endangered species list (of plants). It's a shame public domain seeds are not protected in the same manner patented seeds are.

Q: If two companies develop the same crop with a different genetic modification (and of course they each get patented)and their crops are planted next to each other, hence both crops get cross-pollinated, who sues who and why?

Post new comment

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Image CAPTCHA
We welcome thoughtful comments and ideas. Comments must be on topic. Cheap shots, unsubstantiated allegations, anonymous attacks or negativity directed against people and organizations will not be published. Comments are modified or deleted at the discretion of the editors. If you wish to be identified by name, which will give your opinion far more weight and provide a far greater chance of being published, leave a telephone number so that identity can be confirmed. The number will not be published.